vivid & fossil

verben sind lebewesen
substantive sind versteinerungen

eine subjekt-objekt-fokussierte sprache
bildet die welt starrer, lebloser ab

eine prädikat-orientierte sprache
bildet die welt flüssiger, beweglicher ab

wollen wir probleme lösen
brauchen wir intuition und vernunft

so klingt es substantivisch -
mit dem prädikat im fokus wäre es

das anschauen (intueri) der realtiät und
das vernehmen der realität

dem vernehmen nach

der täter wird vernommen
die stimme wird vernommen

ich vernehme den täter
ich vernehme die stimme

zwei transitive verwendungen
des verbums vernehmen

aus welcher resultiert die vernunft?

5

five questions i asked myself today:

i go for adequate vitamin intake, healthy eating, fresh air and exercise, 

not too much pharma stuff. am i thus already counting among the social darwinists?

unless military metaphors are allowed in the discourse reflection - 

are we but just in a trench war?

why am i unable to listen to the most famous german veterinarian
without getting the impression that even he does not believe himself?

why is an independent extra-parliamentary german left wing obviously incapable
of articulating the slightest skepticism in the federal government's coronavirus directives?
at least of pointing out the most important inconsistencies? is this another field that -
assuming these categories are still valid - has been left to the right by the left?

why does the neue zürcher zeitung advertise with its independent critical view of germany -
only to join the course of german subordination in daily journalistic work, no - 

to beat it by lengths?

delusion

my land, my forest, my meadow -
these are no possessions, any more than
my son, my wife, my mother.
 
all of these "mine" denote relationships.
the possessive pronoun names
what is assigned to my person -
through a cosmic global logic,
that this humanity has lost and that
through all false claims of possession
is to be re-established every minute,
mentally, emotionally, inside the heart….

the concept of possession
is to be replaced here
with that of responsibility.

what is holy:
beings, nature, life -
cannot be possessed.
one can but care for it.

the illusion of wrong ownership
is the beginning of the war.
war is based on delusion.

post war / abuse

can we assume that the political reality 

of the federal republic of germany is shaped by alcohol abuse -

while the era of the weimar republic was based on morphine addiction 

due to injured but surviving soldiers from the first world war?

 

will true countries - will real governments 

be aware of right plant and substance knowledge?

 

any

who's feeling this task heartside:
to honor, worship and protect mother earth,
undoubted embodiment of the material aspect,
must have the greater weight on the lances iustitiae.

every technical innovation needs a strong and special legitimation. 

we can no longer just ask the question of “yes?” or “no?”
but rather: can we not leave things as they are?

civilizations for centuries and millennia ignored the need for that balance ...
and set off on the path of decay - logical conclusion of a perverted idea of ​​growth that is: 

 

increase in terms of feasability, economic strength, expansion of structures
instead of keeping it in the sphere where it belongs to:

biology.

no reason not to make the change now.
to learn. to develop. to begin to live.
is there a point of view more global than this? 

i don't see any.
i am ready to learn but -
i don't see any.

cure & curing (no cyborg)

a real sword of light 

will consist of flesh and blood.
this may lead to condensation 

of being, expansion of space.

it could lead to real hardening.

thus a holy weapon might be born
from biological matter ... 

a scepter ... a sign ...